Dear users, today we have a very personal request. We have decided to offer our learning materials free of charge because we believe in an open, pluralist economic science that is available to everyone, worldwide. We do this without advertising because we want to remain independent of commercial interests. But our commitment to independence and open access also has its price. Every year we have large costs for programming, staff and to support our authors. If everyone reading this gave a small amount, we could keep Exploring Economics thriving for years to come - but 99% of our users don't give. So today we ask you to protect Exploring Economics's independence. The heart and soul of Exploring Economics is a community of people working to bring you unlimited access to high-qualitiy, economic learning and teaching material. Please take just a few moments to help us keep Exploring Economics going. Thank you!
We are a registered non-profit organization | Bank account: Netzwerk Plurale Ökonomik e.V., IBAN: DE91 4306 0967 6037 9737 00, SWIFT-BIC: GENODEM1GLS | Imprint
Global care chains, refugee crisis, and deskilling of workers
Exploring Economics, 2017
Global care chains, refugee crisis, and deskilling of workers
Author: Dita Dobranja
Review: Prof. Dr. Ulrike Knobloch
This is an essay of the writing workshop Gender and the Economy - Perspectives of Feminist Economics, published on 27 July 2017.
International mobility of labour has been a highly debated topic throughout recent decades. As the world has become more integrated and inter-connected, movement of people across borders has become easier and more prevalent. Both high-skilled and low-skilled migration has been subject of studies, in terms of the impact they have on both the source and destination economies. However, when the source country is a developing country and the destination country is developed, studies focus on different analysis. Concerning source countries, on one hand, studies focus disproportionately more on the brain-drain – the emigration of human capital from developing countries to developed countries. In destination economies, on the other hand, most studies focus on the impact of low-skilled labour in the economy – taking into consideration the fact that labor moving from developing countries into developed countries is mostly low skilled. However, there have not been many studies focusing on the phenomenon known as ‘brain waste’ – the underuse of migrant labour force that is skilled and educated.
This article reviews insights of existing literature on global care chains. A specific focus is laid on the impact that the refugee crisis has on global care chains and in turn how the crisis impacts the de-skilling of the women in the migrant workforce. Additionally, areas for future research are highlighted. This article will analyze the main concepts of global care chains, how they are affected by migration, especially with refugee crises, and how this all impacts the deskilling of the migrant work-force
Considering the labour market mismatch that developed countries face, economic analysis can focus on different levels. The major debate in mainstream economics on immigration is whether the migrating labour force is a substitute for, or a complement, to domestic workers. Increased labour supply, through migration, increases the demand for employment in the receiving country, thus creating higher unemployment, unless there is a demand for workers of the skillset that is supplied. In controlled migration, the level of incoming labour and the skills of the labour force are possible to be projected and estimated through policies. In times of crisis, however, when there is an influx of refugees, there is no way to ensure that the migrants’ skill-level is the one needed in the receiving country.
However, in heterodox economics, other factors are considered when assessing the impact of migration, especially in terms of the labour market. In feminist economics, one important subject of analysis is the functioning of global care chains, as one of the key elements that impact women migrants and their participation in the receiving country’s labour force.
Global care chains, in the most elementary description, as developed by Arlie Hochschild in 2000, refer to the ‘personal links between people across the globe based on the paid or unpaid work of caring’ (Hochschild, 2000). The idea of the global care chains, within feminist economics, is both important to the analysis of the valuation of care and household work, and the gendered patterns of migrant labour markets. At present, with a new wave of migration, the latter has become a more pressing issue for analysis. However, there has been limited enquiry on the impact that being part of the global care chains has on the deskilling of the migrant workforce, specifically on migrant women. While some scholars (Kofman cited in Vertovec 2002, Yates 2012) have emphasized the importance of a broader scope of analysis of global care chains, the literature, especially of the recent migrant crisis, is limited. Another important concept to understand for the purpose of this article is deskilling, which, by definition is the decrease in the quality and usage of the knowledge and skills of individuals due to lack of usage or lack of opportunities
Global Care Chains
Hochschild imagined global care chains as a series of responsibilities passed on from one woman to another. It starts with an employed woman in a developed country, who in an attempt to avoid a second shift of household and care work, hires a migrant woman coming from a less developed country to complete the expected household and care work that she is to deliver. As a result, the migrant woman is now also unable to complete the expected household and care work in her own family. She then passes on these duties to another member of the family, often the older daughter. The further down the care chain, the less valued it becomes, with the last woman in the chain usually providing the care work for free (Hochschild, 2000; Yates, 2005). Hochschild’s analysis is based on the idea that the woman from the less developed country usually migrates alone, something which is not always true – often families migrate together. This view is shared by scholars who have built on Hochschild's work. Yates posits that care workers who have migrated are not necessarily mothers, or that those who are, have left their family behind. Instead, they might well have migrated together (Yates, 2012). Parreñas also sees it as important to expand the analysis to women who are not mothers but still have care duties within their household (Parreñas, 2001). These expansions of the analysis are important in the creation of an inclusive gender perspective in the global care chain analysis.
Chart 1. Global Care Chains
Source: Own elaboration based on Hochschild, 2000.
Mainstream economic thought on the global movement of labour
Analysis of migration from a mainstream economic perspective shows a consensus among economists that movement of labor across borders leads to higher global welfare, while the specific impacts especially on the domestic labour force of the recipient country differ and are usually considered negative. Analyzed from the specific-factors model, the impact of immigration on domestic labour force will be different based on whether the migrant labour force is a substitute or a complement to the domestic labour force (McLaren, 2012). The low skilled workers entering the economy due to the humanitarian crisis will be substitutes to current low skilled workers in the economy – making the domestic skilled workers worse off. The low-skilled migrant workforce will be complements to the high skilled workforce in the economy – making the domestic high skilled workers better off. Another economic view, the Rybzynski theorem predicts that the sectors receiving migrant workers will expand, due to higher and cheaper labor force. However trade theory, operating under the assumption of homogeneous workforce and perfect substitutability, as well as being a partial-equilibrium prediction, fails to account for informal barriers to labour market integration, imperfect skill transferability, as well as the impact of labour force movement in general equilibrium (Leeson and Gochenour, 2015). In reality, however, migrant workers do not provide perfect substitutes for the domestic labour force, an assumption which has been key not only to economic theory but to empirical studies as well. Since the impact of migrant labour on domestic labour – specifically on the wages of domestic workers has been central to empirical analysis, the results have been mixed.
However, from a gender perspective in the economics of migrant labour force, it is clear that a very mathematical and theoretical model cannot capture the impact migration has on the domestic labour force. In particular, the analysis that the impact of women migrants on the domestic labour force, as previously explained, shows that in global care chains, women migrants serve as substitutes for the unpaid work of women in the domestic labour force. When integrating the impact that migrant women have on domestic labour force into labour movement analyses studying the effects of on the domestic labour force, to analyze the following picture emerges.
A gendered analysis of the global movement of labour
Constraining the analysis to global care chains, this article will look at the impact that migrant women have on the domestic female labour force, for both when there is skill transferability and when there is not.
First, we consider the scenario where there is skill transferability in the labour market. In this case, unskilled migrant women will serve as complements to skilled women in the domestic labour force. According to mainstream economic theory, they will be substitutes to unskilled women in the domestic labour force. However, considering the impact of migration on global care chains, unskilled migrant women engaging in paid care work will serve as substitutes to the unpaid work of domestic women. Additionally, in the scenario with skill transferability, skilled women will be substitutes to domestic skilled labour in general – not only to skilled women.
Chart 2. If there is skill transferability
Source: Own elaboration.
Second, more realistically, we consider the scenario where there is no or incomplete skill transferability of the migrant labour force. Studies focusing specifically on medical professionals found that there is a skill depreciation among migrant workers (Allan and Aggergaard, 2003; Raghuram and Montiel, 2003). Highly skilled and educated migrants, usually have their skill and education level impaired by their lack of language knowledge, recognition of their educational achievements, as well as cultural shocks they receive in a new country. These barriers to integration in the domestic labour market are the reasons behind skilled labour accepting jobs that devalue and depreciate their skill level. Taking this into consideration when analyzing the behaviour of women migrants in the labour force, it becomes clear that when there is no or little skill transferability, even highly skilled and educated women work in paid care work and become part of global care chains. In this case, both unskilled and skilled migrant women are substitutes to female unpaid work in the receiving country. As such, existing economic models of labour movement are rendered lacking.
Chart 3. If skills are not transferable or incompletely transferable
Source: Own elaboration
Third, the involvement of skilled women migrants in work that underuses their skills and education level results in the deskilling of these women. Deskilling refers to the decrease in the quality and usage of the knowledge and skills of individuals due to lack of usage or lack of opportunities. As a result, when the receiving country simultaneously does not provide the opportunity for skill transferability, as well as a need for care work, it results in skilled women undergoing a deskilling process. In this case, the existence of global care chains serves as a tool for the deskilling of migrant women.
Current trends and considerations
In recent years, developed countries have faced an inflow of unplanned refugees fleeing war zones and escaping humanitarian crisis. EU countries have been disproportionately more targeted as the destination countries of the refugees fleeing Syria, Libya, and Afghanistan. Syrian refugees are estimated to be more skilled than refugees from the Balkans in the 1990s, and represent the majority of asylum seekers in the EU, accounting for 21% of the total (OECD, 2015). As reported in EU countries, the education level of current immigrants is higher than those in the 1990s, with a total of approximately 15% of asylum seekers in 2014 reported to have a tertiary degree, 16% an upper secondary education, 35% lower secondary education, 24% only primary education, and around 11% not having attended school at all (OECD, 2015). However, asylum seekers from Syria (the country of origin for the highest number of refugees), reported higher levels of education, with 21% having attended university, 22% an upper secondary education, and 47% having either lower secondary or primary education (OECD, 2015).
Considering the skill composition of migrants overall, women are expected to have skill levels similar to the general population of migrants. As a result, in the most recent refugee inflow, while the barriers to skill transferability in European labour markets remain high, women becoming part of global care chains will undergo a process of deskilling, as a consequence of their migrant status. The relevance of this to feminist economics coupled with the present-day importance of migration and its impact on a receiving country’s labour force provides an exciting area for further research in feminist economics. Such research serves as an important basis for consideration both in migration studies and in labour economics. Moreover, in the realm of global care chains, there is room for important research with regards to families that have migrated together and the impact global care chains have on them.
Allan H and Aggergaard L (2003) “We Need Respect”: experiences of internationally recruited nurses in the UK, London: Royal College of Nurses
Hochschild, A. R. (2000) 'Global Care Chains and Emotional Surplus Value', in Hutton, W. and Giddens, A. (eds) On The Edge: Living with Global Capitalism. London: Jonathan Cape.
Leeson, Peter T., and Zachary Gochenour. "The Economic Effects of International Labor Mobility." The Economics of Immigration, 2015, 11-37.
McLaren, J. (2013) International Trade: Economic Analysis of Globalization and Policy. Hobo-ken, NJ: Wiley, 2013. Print.
OECD. Is This Humanitarian Migration Crisis Different? 7 (2015): n. pag. OECD. OECD, Sept. 2015. Web. Oct. 2015.
Parreñas, R. (2001) Servants of Globalization: Women, Migration, and Domestic Work. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Raghuram, Parvati and Montiel, Dawn (2003) Skilled migratory regimes: The case of female medical migrants in the UK. In A Montanari (ed) The New Geography of Human Mobility: Ine-quality Trends(pp 67–84): Home of Geography Publication.
Vertovec, S. (2002) ‘Transnational Networks and Skilled Labour Migration’, Oxford: ESRC Transnational Communities Programme Working Paper WPTC 02-02.
Yeates, N. (2012) Global care chains: a state-of-the-art review and future directions in care trans-nationalization research (2012-04). Global Networks, 12(2) (pp. 135-154).
Yeates, N. (2004) Global Care Chains: critical reflections and lines of enquiry (2004-09). International Feminist Journal of Politics, 6(3) (pp. 369-391).