✕
RETHINK
ECONOMICS
RETHINK
ECONOMICS
... and receive personalised notifications on
new pluralistic content directly into your inbox!

Verhaltensökonomik

Hartmut Kliemt
Netzwerk Plurale Ökonomik, 2012
Level: advanced
Perspective: Behavioral Economics
Topic: Microeconomics & Markets
Format: Lecture / Presentation
Duration: 01:19:18
Link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bz6td7mXWyM&index=6&list=PLHcX3MybUIx5TtMbUv118ec6230mYPvHg

Hartmut Kliemt first traces the concept of the homo oeconomicus back to the philosophy of Spinoza and Hobbes. Then he addresses criticisms of this concept in particular by discussing the ultimatum game as a strong piece of counterevidence. After this, he outlines a difference in the behavioural sciences between internal perspectives that seek to understand actors' cognitive processes and external perspectives, which look at observed behaviour only.

Gehe zu: Verhaltensökonomik

Schlagwörter: behavior | decision making | experiments | game theory | homo economicus | psychology | ultimatum game
Max Krahé explains the role of economic planning for a green transition.
2022
Level: advanced
The Whole Field - Markets, planning, and coordinating the green transformation
Max Krahé
Phenomenal World
Lisa Herzog stellt Überlegungen dazu an, was es bedeutet, Märkte einzubetten und welche (normativen) Fragen sich zu einer gesellschaftlichen Einbettung von Märkten stellen würden. Bei Einbettung unterscheidet sie zwischen informeller, z.B. sozialen Gewohnheiten, und formaler Einbettung, z.B. Verträge oder Gesetze. Welche normativen Vorstellungen gibt es von Märkten? Welche Hindernisse gibt es bei der Einbettung? Dabei stellt Herzog unter anderem die Fragen, welche Schäden Märkte anrichten, u.a. durch Machtasymmetrien oder Externalitäten, ob diese durch Einbettung behoben werden können und welche Hindernisse es dabei gibt.
2014
Level: advanced
Legitime und illegitime Schädigungen im Markt - Wie können wir die Grenze ziehen?
Lisa Herzog
Netzwerk Plurale Ökonomik
This article is the first of a series that offers a new paradigm for economics, the “multilevel paradigm,” using generalized Darwinism as its theoretical framework. Generalized Darwinism refers to all processes that combine the ingredients of variation, selection, and replication – not just genetic evolution – making it relevant to the cultural evolution of economic systems that are embedded in political, social, and environmental systems.
2024
Level: advanced
Rethinking the Theoretical Foundation of Economics I: The Multilevel Paradigm
David Sloan Wilson and Dennis J. Snower
De Gruyter Open Access / Zeitschrift Economics, Band 18, Heft 1
This Forum in the Boston Review deals with the role of economics in modern policymaking and presents a wide set of perspectives on the topic. The opening text by Suresh Naidu, Dani Rodrik and Gabriel Zucman aims to answer a range of common criticisms against the modern, neoclassical science of economics and its influence on public discussions.
2019
Level: beginner
Economics After Neoliberalism
Suresh Naidu, Dani Rodrik, Gabriel Zucman
Boston Review

Donate

This project is brought to you by the Network for Pluralist Economics (Netzwerk Plurale Ökonomik e.V.).  It is committed to diversity and independence and is dependent on donations from people like you. Regular or one-off donations would be greatly appreciated.

 

Donate