Dear users, today we have a very personal request. We have decided to offer our learning materials free of charge because we believe in an open, pluralist economic science that is available to everyone, worldwide. We do this without advertising because we want to remain independent of commercial interests. But our commitment to independence and open access also has its price. Every year we have large costs for programming, staff and to support our authors. If everyone reading this gave a small amount, we could keep Exploring Economics thriving for years to come - but 99% of our users don't give. So today we ask you to protect Exploring Economics's independence. The heart and soul of Exploring Economics is a community of people working to bring you unlimited access to high-qualitiy, economic learning and teaching material. Please take just a few moments to help us keep Exploring Economics going. Thank you!
We are a registered non-profit organization | Bank account: Netzwerk Plurale Ökonomik e.V., IBAN: DE91 4306 0967 6037 9737 00, SWIFT-BIC: GENODEM1GLS | Imprint
New Left Review - Sidecar, 2022
Drawing on Gramsci's Marxist Political Economy, Mike Davis situates the War in Ukraine within the general condition of a crisis of capitalist hegemony. The key argument is that the pathological and violent situation that we are finding ourselves in today is an expression of the inability of both global ruling and subaltern classes to develop a (working) strategy for a post-neoliberal future. As forward-looking solutions to the present-day crises cannot be found, ruling class strategies are deeply infused with (imaginary) historical visions. As Davis concisely puts it: "The present must be smashed in order to make an imaginary past the future."
Comment from our editors:
Mike Davis text is very useful for thinking about the war in Ukraine and its global ramifications. The essay captures the irrationalities and pathologies manifesting themselves in the War in Ukraine, while being grounded in a materialist/economic framework. While being deeply pessimist that the ongoing "time of monsters" will end ("Everyone is quoting Gramsci on the interregnum, but that assumes that something new will be or could be born. I doubt it"), Davis still - even if ex negativo - points to the formulation of a post-capitalist vision of the future as the a central antidote to the current tragedy.