Time to Ditch the NAIRU

Comment from our editors:

Is there something even akin to a 'natural rate of unemployment', the infamous term coined by Milton Friedman? And, more to the point, is the theoretical construct of a labour 'market' even scientifically sound?

In this masterly refutation of one of modern central bankers' (and, indeed, macroeconomic mainstream's) central tenets, the non-accelerating inflation rate of unemployment or "NAIRU", James Galbraith demonstrates that since there is no such thing as a labour market in the sense of other markets for goods and services, the concept of a persisting relationship between unemployment and inflation is a fallacy. But as long as rate setters and politicians believe in this Phillips Curve-inspired thought, employment will be sacrificed time and again to ward off an imaginary lift-off in inflation, effecting huge economic and social cost to no avail. In his train of argument, Galbraith is relentlessly Post-Keynesian, stipulating that aggregate demand determines the rate of employment, while nominal wages are subject to exogenous factors such as the relative bargaining power of trade unions and employers, leaving no place for a deterministic relationship between unemployment and inflation.

Go to: Time to Ditch the NAIRU